I have proof. Or, I'm going to keep talking & making new accusations, bring up new evidence with no intention of stopping, listening to your response or believing your defense.
Don't you think it would be best for your child to be in foster care for the next few months or years until this gets resolved? I do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OK - I forgot my login info...
ReplyDeleteNew posts will be here until I remember what it was...
Imagine this...
Imagine your child is being held hostage by someone who is causing her harm. The person holding her hostage says "You can spend time with her for 1 hour a day (or week or month) if you follow my rules."
Which do you choose, as a parent?
1) follow the rules (but don't stop quietly trying to figure out how to get your child free)?
2) don't follow the rules & do things your way?
Me? I'd be kissing all kinds of butts in that situation.
Oh, for god's sake - the restraining order isn't about constitutional rights - it's about showing you can be a reasonable co-parent with your child's other parent, who has not been proven in any court of law to be an unfit parent.
ReplyDeleteEvery single time you exercise your constitutional rights to say whatever you want to say (and, that could easily be argued by citing libel & slander laws, along with the old 'shouting fire in a crowded theater' argument), you are telling the courts that you feel your rights are more important than your responsibilities as a parent - your responsibility to allow your child to love and respect their other parent without fear of angering or hurting your adult feelings.
You really don't get it at all. This is not a criminal court. This is a family court.
OMG... Just read the whack stuff about the bible codes. WTF? That's like 'magic' astrology talk.
ReplyDeleteIf the bible codes tell you everything about everyone & have the whole history of everything written in them, then why all the drama? Why not just either sit back & see what the future brings, since it's all predestined in the codes, or use that special secret info to make the changes necessary to meet your desires?
Dude - that's crazy talk...
"But not one therapist will EVER convince me that a child does not need her mother, nor that Connie is a detriment to this child."
ReplyDeleteThere is no magic in 'mother'. Did Caylee Anthony need her mother? Some mothers are not a positive presence in their children's lives.
Every child needs responsible adults in their lives - adults who are able to move past their own self-centered view of the world & take on the awesome responsibility of guiding and raising a child. It really doesn't matter what that adult's gender is, or how they are related to the child.
Even people measured to have high IQ's can be emotionally unstable. An IQ score shows the person's potential & ability to learn - nothing more.
ReplyDeleteContinuing to perpetuate the mother's campaign of craziness isn't 'erring on the side of the child'. It's 'erring on the side of the mother'. If mom is wrong about all of this & wasting her child's valuable childhood on creating her own personal drama, then helping mom with this drama is actually detrimental to this child, wasting her all-important, never able to be recreated or recovered, formative preschool years.
ReplyDeleteI wish that I could remember the email address & password I used for this blog... I'd like to add some ip address tracking to it :-p
ReplyDeleteI like your posts, well thought out and far more even balanced than I've been able ever be.
ReplyDeleteMy passion comes from being furious this mother did this to her child. Brought her real name and face for the world to see and connected it to the words child molester & pedophile with no real proof or evidence = exploitation.
I hope you continue to blog "WhatIThink" because you have the ability to take the emotion out of the case and be an outside observant 'participant'.
I think about the only thing I disagree about your point on the other page is to remove the child from the home. When there is truly no evidence by physical, medical or psychological, it would do a great deal of emotional and psychological damage to the child to be placed with strangers when she's in a loving home. I believe the authorities continue to do what's needed to ensure safety. BabyA does see a counselor on a regular basis alone without her father by her side. They evaluate her progress and continue to report back to the courts regularly. When their observations include her continuing to thrive in her fathers care, she's matured, over-come, improved dramatically, etc... then I wonder what was the 'true' delay of the child's development. What was the common denominator?
Well that's my 2cents. Keep writing, I appreciate an unemotional more logical approach you've taken.
~Patty~
I see you may have been ~sarcastic~ about your comment of removing babyA. I'll leave it to you to respond.
ReplyDeleteHave a great Thanksgiving... I know babyA is headed to a huge family gathering today. Wouldn't her mother rather enjoy her child on this holiday than yell about her civil rights? Probably not
I forgot to add I thoroughly enjoy your humorous take on this... K I'm done now.
ReplyDeleteOff to pull out my homemade cinnamon buns out of the oven. (no, not pilsbury doughboy hoo hoo stuff)... I worked my butt off from scratch.
Evil nasty Pattycake father supporter who also supports babyA's civil rights (how dare she not believe the mother...) does have kids, husband and 3 too many dogs (we all rescued). Now where's my stalkers? lol
The blog is amusing and has great points.. now don't go and look me up on the web and stalk me now :P. Oy one thing you don't want on your back is a psycho Bedwell!
ReplyDeleteLMAO genius
ReplyDeleteor a bible coding one Butters
ReplyDeleteAhhh... It's only 9:30am in California, now. I'm wondering what's happening. Having had experience myself with family court & custody issues (and, I'm not sure if this is family court or civil court today), I do know that they almost never address the actual motion brought before them and that continuances are par for the course....
ReplyDeleteOoh - fun bible code toy online at: http://www.onlinebiblecode.com/
ReplyDeleteTry searching chapter 11 of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland for 'Connie, Liar, Herpes'. Pretty damning evidence, I think. I hope Darrel's using protection!
It's 4:15p in California - still no update anywhere...
ReplyDeleteLOL, love your new toy...
ReplyDeleteAnd it does not surprise me there is no news yet, how many days did it take last time to come up with the spin that Connie was too sick??
If Connie got her way she'd be screaming all over the net right?
ReplyDeleteConnie will have a GREAT WIN spin I'm sure.
ReplyDeleteShe asked for a trial, didn't get one. She has to request it via another judge. No guarantee that judge will agree.
She asked for removal of the restraining order, didn't get it.
Judge put sanctioning Connie on HOLD until the criminal investigation with the DA's office was completed. There is no continuance date UNTIL the DA makes a decision on criminal charges on Connie.
OH OH OH???
SHE DIDN'T even bother to ask to see her kid AT ALL! SOME MOTHER! I thought this was about her kid??? REALLY? WHY not see your kid Connie?? ITS NEVER ABOUT AALI! Its all about a selfish woman who isn't getting her way.
Hmm not a big surprise!
ReplyDeleteWas this a civil case or a family court one? Are they intermingled in some way?
ReplyDeleteI saw 'Connie didn't take the stand' on the teaser on the other blogs. That's not really necessary for her lawyer to petition the court on her behalf.
What was the point of today's court date? And, if it was family court, I know that the time in court is not at all limited to 'what's on the agenda'. In fact, most of the haggling happens outside of the courtroom, between the lawyers, who then bring their adjustments to the judge. I've seen it in action many times over.
According to KarenCCC on Troys she says that Bowman didn't show up, Connie didn't take the stand and no continuance on the restraining order and she says "if there even is one". lmao what so is Connie going to say her restraining order is lifted and get into huge trouble? Dumby.
ReplyDeleteI already see their spin spin spin..... Wow hey I guess I was right there isn't a big win for Connie and nothing really happened but it doesn't look good for Connie. The future looks pretty bleak if they are investigating her with criminal charges.
Perhaps she's been laboring under the misconception that there is a restraining order in place for the past year. Is she right about not having visitation? Or, could it be that that's not a problem, either?
ReplyDeleteIs the kidsinperil blogger her lawyer? :p
The reason the DA is even investigating Connie is for the money fraud and she isn't suppose to be posting online at all because of the restraining order.. but I do doubt she hasn't been.
ReplyDeleteMoving over here, for the fun of it: http://troyofillinois.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeletekidsinperil blogger isn't a lawyer she's a woman with a law degree
ReplyDeleteoops - i forgot to make comments anonymous on troyofillinois.blogspot.com. They are anonymous now. That's just more fun, I think. I believe conversations should focus on the words that are being said & the ideas being presented. That has nothing to do with who is saying it. And, I believe that personal attacks (especially stalkerish threats on family & livelihood) are what people resort to when they think they are losing an argument. They are the internet equivalent of physical violence. Being able to bully someone into being quiet doesn't mean you're right about whatever point you were discussing before the bullying happened.
ReplyDeleteOy don't I know it! :P
ReplyDeleteAnon dec. 1 6:23am Are you being funny or are you Karen wanting more attention?
ReplyDeleteI'm the person who started this blog, started the troyofillinois.blogspot one and typed the 6:23am comment here re: allowing anonymous comments on the troyofillinois.blogspot blog.
ReplyDeleteAnd, I'm not Karen.
I'm not really looking for attention, just conversation.
I wasn't intending to be funny with the 6:23am comment, although if you found it funny, I'm glad that I could lighten your day :-)
I thought it was funny *shrug* Tro..Karen probably would be threatening or trying to insult me some how by now if she were on here lol.
ReplyDeleteI was kidding with the Karen attention thing. I thought the troyblogspot is funny like this place. :)
ReplyDelete